Factorial Structure and Psychometric Invariance of the Digital AUDIM-M in Mexican University Athletes and Non-Athletes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rce-fod.v20i1.127

Keywords:

self-concept, instrumental study, factorial structure, construct validation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties proposed by Aguirre et al. (2017) for the short version of the Dimensional Self-Concept Questionnaire (AUDIM-M). The total sample consisted of 955 Mexican university students, including 463 athletes and 492 non-athletes, aged 18–26 years (M = 20.5; DE = 1.9). The factorial structure of the questionnaire was examined through confirmatory factor analyses. The results indicate that a four-factor structure (personal self-concept, physical self-concept, social self-concept, and academic self-concept) is viable and appropriate for the total sample as well as for the subgroups of Mexican university athletes and non-athletes. The four-factor structure demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity indicators based on both statistical and substantive criteria. Furthermore, the factorial structure, factor loadings, and intercepts were found to be invariant according to the variable of sports practice. However, significant differences were observed between athletes and non-athletes in three of the four factors studied (personal, physical, and social self-concept). In conclusion, the AUDIM-M can be considered a useful tool for advancing the study of factors affecting self-concept. Additional studies with larger and more diverse samples are recommended to generalize the results and further refine the instrument.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abalo, J., Lévy, J., Rial, A., & Varela, J. (2006). Invarianza factorial con muestras múltiples. En J. Lévy (Ed.), Modelización con Estructuras de Covarianzas en Ciencias Sociales (pp. 259-278). Netbiblo.

Aguirre, J. F., Blanco, H., Peinado, J. E., Mondaca, F., & Rangel, Y. (2017). Factorial composition of the Dimensional Self-Concept Questionnaire AUDIM-M in Mexican university students. Nova scientia, 9(18), 627-645. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v9i18.830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v9i18.830

Arbuckle, J. R. (2016). AMOS users guide version 24.0. Marketing Department, SPSS Incorporated.

Arens, A. K., Jansen, M., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Brunner, M. (2021). The structure of academic self-concept: A methodological review and empirical illustration of central models. Review of educational research, 91(1), 34-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186

Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Babic, M. J., Morgan, P. J., Plotnikoff, R. C., Lonsdale, C., White, R. L., & Lubans, D. R. (2014). Physical activity and physical self-concept in youth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports medicine, 44(11), 1589-1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0229-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0229-z

Biddle, S. J. H., Mutrie, N., & Gorely, T. (2015). Psychology of Physical Activity Determinants, well-being and interventions. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123492

Blanco, H., Ornelas, M., Tristán, J. L., Cocca, A., Mayorga-Vega, D., López-Walle, J., & Viciana, J. (2013). Editor for creating and applying computerise surveys. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 935-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.105

Boehnke, K. (2022). Let’s compare apples and oranges! A plea to demystify measurement equivalence. American Psychologist, 77(9), 1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001080

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Cao, C., & Liang, X. (2022). Sensitivity of fit measures to lack of measurement invariance in exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(2), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1975287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1975287

Chacón-Cuberos, R., Zurita-Ortega, F., García-Marmol, E., & Castro-Sánchez, M. (2020). Autoconcepto multidimensional según práctica deportiva en estudiantes universitarios de Educación Física de Andalucía. Retos, 37, 174-180. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.71861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.71861

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007SEM0902_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Costigan, S. A., Eather, N., Plotnikoff, R. C., Hillman, C. H., & Lubans, D. R. (2016). High-Intensity Interval Training for Cognitive and Mental Health in Adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(10), 1985-1993. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000993

Duclos-Bastías, D., Giakoni-Ramírez, F., & Martínez-Cevallos, D. (2022). Physical self-concept and physical activity levels in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cluster analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(5), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052850

Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenadas. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.

Esnaola, I., Goñi, A., & Madariaga, J. M. (2008). El autoconcepto: perspectivas de investigación. Revista de psicodidáctica, 13(1), 69-96.

Estrada-Araoz, E. G., Quispe-Mamani, Y. A., Noblega-Reinoso, H., & Malaga-Yllpa, Y. (2024). Autoconcepto físico y motivación hacia la práctica de actividad física en estudiantes universitarios: un estudio transversal. Retos, 61, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109580

Fernández-Bustos, J. G., Infantes-Paniagua, Á., Cuevas, R., & Contreras, O. R. (2019). Effect of physical activity on self-concept: Theoretical model on the mediation of body image and physical self-concept in adolescents. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01537

Fischer, R., Karl, J., Luczak-Roesch, M., & Hartle, L. (2025). Why We Need to Rethink Measurement Invariance: The Role of Measurement Invariance for Cross-Cultural Research. Cross-Cultural Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971241312459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971241312459

Foster, N., & Piacentini, M. (2023). Cross-cultural validity and comparability in assessments of complex constructs. En N. Foster & M. Piacentini (Eds.), Innovating Assessments to Measure and Support Complex Skills (pp. 190-203). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e5f3e341-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/e5f3e341-en

Franco, H., Blanco, H., Jurado, P. J., Aguirre, S. I., & Blanco, J. R. (2018). Invarianza Factorial del Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Dimensional AUDIM-M en Hombres y Mujeres Universitarios Mexicanos. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(29), 231. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n29p231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n29p231

García, F., & Musitu, G. (1999). Autoconcepto forma 5. Tea Ediciones.

Garn, A. C., Morin, A. J., White, R. L., Owen, K. B., Donley, W., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity as a predictor of changes in physical self-concept in adolescents. Health Psychology, 39(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000815

Gelabert, E., García-Esteve, L., Martín-Santos, R., Gutiérrez, F., Torres, A., & Subirà, S. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale in women. Psicothema, 23(1), 133-139.

Grao-Cruces, A., Fernández-Martínez, A., Teva-Villén, M. R., & Nuviala, A. (2017). Autoconcepto físico e intencionalidad para ser físicamente activo en los participantes del programa escuelas deportivas. Journal of sport and health research, 9(1), 15-26.

Jiménez, C., Peinado, J. E., Solano-Pinto, N., Ornelas, M., y Blanco, H. (2020). Relaciones entre autoconcepto y bienestar psicológico en universitarias mexicanas. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicologica, 55(2), 59–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP55.2.05

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford publications.

Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905-924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441

Maassen, E., D'Urso, E. D., van Assen, M. A., Nuijten, M. B., de Roover, K., & Wicherts, J. M. (2022). The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science. Psychological methods, 10.1037/met0000624. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n3f5u

Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1

Mayorga-Vega, D., Viciana, J., Cocca, A., & De Rueda, B. (2012). Effect of a Physical Fitness Program on Physical Self-Concept and Physical Fitness Elements in Primary School Students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115(3), 984-996. https://doi.org/10.2466/06.10.25.PMS.115.6.984-996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/06.10.25.PMS.115.6.984-996

McNamee, J., Timken, G. L., Coste, S. C., Tompkins, T. L., & Peterson, J. (2016). Adolescent girls’ physical activity, fitness and psychological well-being during a health club physical education approach. European Physical Education Review, 23(4), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16658882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16658882

Monacis, D., Trecroci, A., Invernizzi, P. L., & Colella, D. (2022). Can Enjoyment and Physical Self-Perception Mediate the Relationship between BMI and Levels of Physical Activity? Preliminary Results from the Regional Observatory of Motor Development in Italy. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(19), 12567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912567

Morin, A. J., Myers, N. D., & Lee, S. (2020). Modern factor analytic techniques: Bifactor models, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and Bifactor‐ESEM. In G. Tenenbaum, R. C. Eklund, & N. Boiangin (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology: Exercise, methodologies, & special topics (4th ed., pp. 1044–1073). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119568124.ch51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119568124.ch51

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Teoría Psicométrica. McGraw-Hill.

Pavlović, S., Pelemiš, V., Marković, J., Dimitrijević, M., Badrić, M., Halaši, S., Nikolić, I., & Čokorilo, N. (2023). The role of motivation and physical self-concept in accomplishing physical activity in primary school children. Sports, 11(9), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11090173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11090173

Pirazán, M. J. (2021). Incidencia de la actividad física sobre la percepción del autoconcepto físico en estudiantes universitarios. Quaestiones Disputatae, 14(29), 57-77.

Portillo, S. A. (2020). Autoconcepto multidimensonal del profesorado que realiza estudios de posgrado. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 12(6), 232-239.

Pulido, E. G., Redondo, M. P., Lora, L. J., & Jiménez, L. K. (2023). Medición del autoconcepto: una revisión. Psykhe (Santiago), 32(1). https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2020.22389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2020.22389

Rendón, P. A., Veas, A., & Navas, L. (2024). El autoconcepto físico de los estudiantes universitarios en el Ecuador. Retos, 51, 566-577. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.100308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.100308

Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z

Revuelta, L., Rodríguez, A., Ruiz, U., & Ramos-Díaz, E. (2016). Autoconcepto multidimensional: medida y relaciones con el rendimiento académico. Revista Internacional de Evaluación y Medición de la Calidad Educativa, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.18848/2386-7787/CGP/v02i01/13-24

Rodríguez, M. N., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227.

Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of educational research, 46(3), 407-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407

Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000

Toapanta, S. G., & Lara, C. M. (2024). Motivación académica y resiliencia en estudiantes. Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria PENTACIENCIAS, 6(4), 247-256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v6i4.1133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v6i4.1133

Tomás, I., González-Roma, V., & Gómez, J. (2000). Teoría de respuesta al ítem y análisis factorial confirmatorio: dos métodos para analizar la equivalencia psicométrica en la traducción de cuestionarios. Psicothema, 12(2), 540-544.

Watkins, E. R., & Newbold, A. (2020). Factorial designs help to understand how psychological therapy works. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00429

Yang, Z., Yang, Z., Ou, W., Zeng, Q., & Huang, J. (2024). Effects of physical activity interventions on physical self-perception in college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 21(10), 990-1007. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0055

Zamorano-Garcia, D., Infantes-Paniagua, A., Cuevas-Campos, R., & Fernández-Bustos, J. G. (2023). Impact of physical activity-based interventions on children and adolescents’ physical self-concept: A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 94(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1927945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1927945

Published

2025-03-19

How to Cite

Barcelo Reyna, R., Blanco Ornelas, L. H., Díaz Leal, A. C., Ornelas Contreras, M., & López Pulgarín, J. A. (2025). Factorial Structure and Psychometric Invariance of the Digital AUDIM-M in Mexican University Athletes and Non-Athletes. Revista De Ciencias Del Ejercicio FOD, 20(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.29105/rce-fod.v20i1.127