Agreement and Repeatability of a Time-Interval Measurement Prototype for Controlled Horizontal-Displacement Tasks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rce-fod.v21i2.211

Keywords:

concordance; reliability; instrumental validation; photocells; horizontal displacement.

Abstract

The development of locally engineered technology for human movement assessment offers an alternative to costly imported instruments. This instrumental method-comparison study evaluated the repeatability of Prototype II, a photocell-based electronic device for measuring time intervals during controlled horizontal-displacement tasks, and its agreement with Newtest Powertimer and Chronojump Boscosystem in indoor and outdoor environments. Repeatability was assessed at 1.5, 6, and 15 s in sessions separated by 24 hours. Agreement was assessed at 2, 5, and 12 s using 35 paired technical repetitions for each interval-by-environment condition, with simultaneous measurements from Prototype II and both comparison systems. Relative reliability was summarized with ICC(2,1), while absolute repeatability was prioritized using CV% and SEM; agreement was summarized with Lin's CCC. ICCs for repeated Prototype II measurements were low or negative under restricted between-trial variance, whereas CV% ranged from 0.49% to 1.92% and SEM from 0.019 to 0.042 s. CCC ranged from 0.94 to 0.99 outdoors, from 0.809 to 0.915 indoors at 2 and 5 s, and from 0.623 to 0.636 at 12 s indoors. These results support repeatable technical performance and substantial agreement in several tested conditions, particularly outdoors, but do not establish practical interchangeability because no a priori acceptable-difference threshold was defined. Prototype II is a promising locally developed timing system that warrants further validation against traceable standards and during real movement tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altmann, S., Spielmann, M., Engel, F. A., Neumann, R., Ringhof, S., Oriwol, D., & Haertel, S. (2017). Validity of single-beam timing lights at different heights. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(7), 1994–1999. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001889

Altmann, S., Ringhof, S., Becker, B., Woll, A., & Neumann, R. (2018). Error-correction processing in timing lights for measuring sprint performance: Does it work? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13(10), 1400–1402. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0596

Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 26(4), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

Bond, C. W., Willaert, E. M., & Noonan, B. C. (2017). Comparison of three timing systems: Reliability and best practice recommendations in timing short-duration sprints. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(4), 1062–1071. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001566

Earp, J. E., & Newton, R. U. (2012). Advances in electronic timing systems: Considerations for selecting an appropriate timing system. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(5), 1245–1248. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182474436

Giavarina, D. (2015). Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica, 25(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.015

Gutiérrez Vargas, R. (2023). Diseño, fabricación, concordancia y confiabilidad de un dispositivo electrónico para el control de intervalos en el entrenamiento físico [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional]. Repositorio Académico Institucional de la Universidad Nacional. http://hdl.handle.net/11056/28033

Haugen, T., & Buchheit, M. (2016). Sprint running performance monitoring: Methodological and practical considerations. Sports Medicine, 46(5), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0446-0

Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Lin, L. I. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051

Linnet, K. (1993). Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies. Clinical Chemistry, 39(3), 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/39.3.424

Multhauptt, W., Fernández-Peña, E., Moreno-Villanueva, A., Soler-López, A., Rico-González, M., Clemente, F. M., Bravo-Cucci, S., & Pino-Ortega, J. (2024). Concurrent-validity and reliability of photocells in sport: A systematic review. Journal of Human Kinetics, 92, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/174285

Pino-Ortega, J., & Rico-González, M. (Eds.). (2021). The use of applied technology in team sport. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003157007

Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2015). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). F.A. Davis.

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1979-25169-001

Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1

Zou, G. Y. (2013). Confidence interval estimation for the Bland–Altman limits of agreement with multiple observations per individual. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 22(6), 630–642. https://journals.sagepu

Downloads

Published

2026-11-13

How to Cite

Ulloa-Sandí, A., Pino-Ortega, J., Gutierrez-Vargas, R., & Rojas-Valverde, D. (2026). Agreement and Repeatability of a Time-Interval Measurement Prototype for Controlled Horizontal-Displacement Tasks. Revista De Ciencias Del Ejercicio FOD, 21(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.29105/rce-fod.v21i2.211